TetraMap

Comparisons with Other Models

 
On this page:

In all the time I've worked as a consultant I've never been fully satisfied with any of the well know behavioural profiles. As a global consultancy, we've used a number of them over the years. No matter how good the profile was (and there are some good ones) it always ended up putting people into boxes, and boxes create boxed thinking. When I first attended a TetraMap workshop I was amazed how quickly, and easily, the exercises led people to greater clarity and understanding of their nature. What we like overall and what we believe sets TetraMap apart, is the use of the tetrahedron shape. It takes us from a 2D to a 3D model. Its emphasis on equal and interconnected elements puts us a step closer to understanding the reality of human nature. Intuitively TetraMap feels right, that's why I think it goes down with any audience, anywhere in the world and why we are plan to use it exclusively.
Colin Hiles - Partner, RogenSi, UK

TetraMap’s Four Elements of Behaviour

The terminology is a simple but deep cross-cultural metaphor of Nature. TetraMap is a non-prescriptive framework that enables people to intuitively make sense of their own observations of behaviour - great for understanding how a person is different in general. Other models are better for understanding how a person is different in detail.

Hippocrates’ Four Humours

The early Greek philosophers believed that everything in nature was made from four basic constituents: earth, air, water and fire. Hippocrates associated the four Elements with certain body fluids or humours that determined our health and temperament.

Jung’s Psychological Types

Jung observed four major types, each of which could be either extroverted or introverted. TetraMap distinguishes Jung’s extroverted Sensing and Intuitive, and his introverted Thinking and Feeling.

Marston’s DISC Model

In this book entitled The Emotions of Normal People Marston held that behaviour depends on whether people are either passive or active and whether they perceive the environment to be favourable or antagonistic. TetraMap avoids the negative connotations of his terminology, while keeping the same intent.

Ned Herrmann’s Whole Brain Model

Herrmann’s model relates behaviour to the left/right and cerebral/limbic quadrants of the brain. TetraMap gives more weight to the distinction between the thinking and doing attributes.